Hare Wynn Sweeps Legal Categories in Birmingham Magazine’s “Best of Birmingham” Reader’s Poll for 4th Consecutive Year

BIRMINGHAM- For the fourth year in a row, Hare Wynn has been recognized in Birmingham Magazine’s annual “Best of Birmingham” reader’s poll, as a “Best Law Firm” finalist.

Each year, Birmingham Magazine asks its readers to vote on the best of the best in the Magic City. As the state’s oldest lifestyle magazine, the ‘Best of Birmingham’ is a highly anticipated and well- regarded seal, demonstrating innovation within a specific industry, exceptional customer service, and expertise in a particular field of practice.

In its second century of practice, Hare Wynn is one of the top class-action law firms in the country. Hare Wynn’s success has come as a result of the unique opportunity its attorneys have had to become both experienced and successful trial lawyers, as well as legal tacticians. Whether arguing to a jury in a rural county in Arkansas or to the United States Supreme Court, Hare Wynn’s lawyers have a proven track record of success for their clients.

Hare Wynn began in the late 1800s, and, through the firm’s founder, Francis Hare, was instrumental in making plaintiffs’ litigation affordable to those needing high quality representation in significant litigation. Built on a legacy of representing individuals, Hare Wynn continues to build on more than 100 years of successful trial experience in its representation of individuals, Fortune 500 companies, small business and governmental entities.

Most recently, the magnitude of the firm’s litigation success was recognized when Hare Wynn was identified as one of the top plaintiffs’ firms in the United States in being named to the National Law Journal’s Plaintiffs’ Hot List. The Journal honored Hare Wynn as one of 20 firms nationally “that are at the cutting edge of plaintiffs’ work – and giving the defense a run for their money.”

Winners of the Best of Birmingham reader’s poll will be recognized on Sept. 18 at The Club.

Share This:

Get My FREE Case Review